Header Ads

Facebook VS Girl. Facebook Looses Legal Case.

Recent events have shown how difficult it is for Facebook to navigate between censorship and protection.

A legal case against Facebook, which will involve a 14-year-old taking the corporation to court in Belfast over naked pictures published on the social network, could open the gates for other civil cases, according to lawyers who struggle with victims of revenge pornography.

Facebook has lost a legal bid to prevent a 14-year-old girl from suing the firm over a naked picture of her that was posted on a “shame page” on the site as an act of revenge.

A high court judge in Belfast on Monday rejected Facebook’s endeavor to have the claim by the girl struck out. She is also taking legal action against the man who allegedly posted the picture in what lawyers claim is the first case of its kind in the UK.

A lawyer for the teenager, who cannot be named because of her age, considered the publishing of the photo to a method of child abuse.

The girl is seeking damages for abuse of private information, carelessness and breach of the Data Protection Act.

Must read: Nudity and Facebook's Censors. Find out what?

Her photograph was said to have been posted on a so-called shame page on Facebook numerous times between November 2014 and January 2016.

The girl’s legal team claimed that Facebook had the capability to block any re-publication by using a tracking process to identify the image.

The court heard it should have been a “red line” concern for the company.

A lawyer for Facebook explained the claim for damages should be dismissed, saying the company always took down the picture when it was notified.

Facebook’s lawyers relied on a European directive that they claimed provides protection from having to monitor a vast amount of online material for what is posted on one page.

The case against Facebook and the man who it is claimed originally posted the picture will now move to full trial in Belfast at a later date.

Must read: Win upto 200MB 3G Data Free 

It is not the first time Facebook has been prosecuted for its role in hosting sexual images posted for the purpose of revenge.

In 2014, a Texas woman reportedly sued the company for $123m for failing to stop posts superimposing her face on nude images, but the case was rejected.

Facebook is frequently becoming embroiled in arguments about what content it does and does not allow on its platform.

There was complaint last week after Norway’s best-selling newspaper ran a front page letter criticizing the social network’s decision to remove a famous image of a naked young girl running from a napalm attack during the Vietnam war, posted by writer Tom Egeland.

Facebook also removed a post by Norway’s prime minister, in which she criticized the social network and reposted the image, before relenting and saying it would allow the image.

Must read: Safer Digital India

While the company has included methods – both automated and human – to control what appears on its website, it has regularly attempted to avoid taking full accountability, claiming that it is a technology platform, rather than a publisher.

The Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, told students at an event in Rome last month that Facebook would remain a tech firm and not become a media company.

Facebook did not immediately respond to a call for comment.

No comments

Powered by Blogger.